Current:Home > StocksPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -Nova Finance Academy
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:07:11
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (86119)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Inside Clean Energy: Not a Great Election Year for Renewable Energy, but There’s Reason for Optimism
- House escalates an already heated battle over federal government diversity initiatives
- Janet Yellen visits Ukraine and pledges even more U.S. economic aid
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- These Stars' First Jobs Are So Relatable (Well, Almost)
- Elevate Your Wardrobe With the Top 11 Trending Amazon Styles Right Now
- Eli Lilly cuts the price of insulin, capping drug at $35 per month out-of-pocket
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Medical debt affects millions, and advocates push IRS, consumer agency for relief
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Succession and The White Lotus Casts Reunite in Style
- Titanic Sub Passenger, 19, Was Terrified to Go But Agreed for Father’s Day, Aunt Says
- CBOhhhh, that's what they do
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Florida’s Red Tides Are Getting Worse and May Be Hard to Control Because of Climate Change
- Air quality alerts issued for Canadian wildfire smoke in Great Lakes, Midwest, High Plains
- Inside Clean Energy: Des Moines Just Set a New Bar for City Clean Energy Goals
Recommendation
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
The Dominion Lawsuit Pulls Back The Curtain On Fox News. It's Not Pretty.
2 more eyedrop brands are recalled due to risks of injury and vision problems
Exploring Seinfeld through the lens of economics
Travis Hunter, the 2
Amber Heard Makes Red Carpet Return One Year After Johnny Depp Trial
Nissan recalls over 800K SUVs because a key defect can cut off the engine
North Dakota, Using Taxpayer Funds, Bailed Out Oil and Gas Companies by Plugging Abandoned Wells